Pregnancy outcomes by age group. Abstinence only programs effect sex education in Burnaby parents, educators or policy makers it should be our goals that 1 teens can make educated reproductive and sexual health decisions, that 2 teen pregnancy and STD rates are reduced to the rates of other developed nations, and that 3 these trends are maintained through the teenage years into adulthood.
Introduction The appropriate type of sex education that should be taught in U. The data are reported as number of teen pregnancies, teen births or teen abortions per one thousand female teens between 15 and 19 years of age.
Comprehensive programs also usually abstinence only programs effect sex education in Burnaby information about healthy relationships, communication skills, and human development, among other topics. The central message of these programs is to delay sexual activity until marriage, and under the federal funding regulations most of these programs cannot include information about contraception or safer-sex practices .
Journal abstinence only programs effect sex education in Burnaby Adolescent Health. Socioeconomic disadvantage and adolescent women's sexual and reproductive behavior: the case of five developed countries. AccessedNov Every state, except California, has received funding from this program at some point, and currently half of states do.
Sex Res Soc Policy 5: The effectiveness of Level 1 comprehensive sex education in our nation-wide analysis is supported by Kirby's meta-analysis of individual sex education programs Underwood et al.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. New York Times. Penn GSE News. Abstinence-only programs might work, study says.
Other factors may also influence teenage pregnancy and birth rates, including socio-economic status, education, cultural influences  —  , and access to contraception through Medicaid waivers  —  and such effects must be parsed out statistically to examine the relationship between sex education and teen pregnancy and birth rates.
The study also found that youth that participated in the programs were no more likely to engage in unprotected sex than youth who did not participate. This was not the case. The Council for Community and Economic Research.