A bill that would expand the law to cover charter schools is currently on Gov. But in Cupertino the board voted to scrap the original curriculum aimed at middle schoolers and adopted a new one at the end of last year that parents were more comfortable with.
More then 75 people protest about sex education teachings outside the San Bernardino County Board of Education as they are reflected in the door of a school bus in San Bernardino on Friday, May 17, Fires have closed these 29 California parks. The answer? Pregnancy is considered to be pres levels.
Follow Us twitter instagram email facebook.
But, in many respects, they face an uphill battle because the Healthy Youth Act is an unfunded mandate — legislators provided no money for compliance when they passed it in Mail shake-up at L. Times News Platforms. And except for some outcry in San Diego, officials in these districts say the pushback from parents and community members has been minimal.
Such a double standard. And programs that were once in place for state audits were largely gutted during the recession years.
Students who decline entry are required to re-apply for possible selection through the multi-criteria admission process. It is suggested that students attend a Nursing Information Orientation given by the Counseling Department, which can be reached here. The board drew up a list of rules under which the program will be taught.
Cynthia Scheinberg, executive director of the Coalition for Children, Adolescents and Parents, which is coordinating the pilot program, said ENABL is crucial because Santa Ana has one of the highest teen pregnancy rates in the nation and because the program has been shown to reduce teen pregnancy.
The Healthy Youth Act requires districts to allow parents to review the curriculum and class materials. We plan to implement our new curriculum in the spring of , after community engagement this fall and winter. The Healthy Youth Act, which was authored by Assemblywoman Shirley Weber, D-San Diego, covers a broader array of sexual health issues and is considerably more specific than the previous law.
Who knows? The SDUSD board has shamefully rubber-stamped her callous approach, blatantly ignoring legitimate parent concerns.